Global Integrity Report: Czech Republic - 2010

This peer-reviewed country report includes:

Integrity Indicators Scorecard: Scores, scoring criteria, commentary, references, and peer review perspectives for more than 300 Integrity Indicators.

Reporter's Notebook: An on-the-ground look at corruption and integrity from a leading local journalist.

Corruption Timeline: Ten years of political context to today's corruption and integrity issues.

HIGHLIghts

Despite being firmly ensconced in the EU, the Czech Republic suffers from weaknesses in several key dimensions of good governance and anti-corruption. Its fairly robust overall legal framework for anti-corruption notwithstanding, the country is struggling to improve the implementation and enforcement of those laws in order to bolster its overall anti-corruption efforts. Oversight agencies such as the ombudsman and audit office are well-established, although their investigatory and prosecutorial powers remain ineffective. Perhaps the Czech Republic’s most flagrant deficiency is in political financing: the country was one of the worst performers in this area among all the countries covered in the Global Integrity Report: 2010. While there is a legal mandate for parties to disclose donations as well as a monitoring system of their finances, other disclosure requirements, monitoring practices, and donation limits remain extremely weak at both the legal and practical levels. Certain conflicts of interest regulations do exist for members of the legislature, judiciary, and civil service, but they are poorly enforced. For instance, the Civil Service Act, which encompasses conflicts of interest and political independence rules, was adopted as a condition of EU membership, but its implementation has been delayed until January 2012 because of attempts by government parties to retain influence over the civil service. The anti-corruption agency is heavily politicized, with the director appointed by the head of the police. Despite these challenges, the flood of corruption scandals that have been exposed over the past several years point to the vibrancy of the Czech media as a key watchdog.

From the Reporter's Notebook: It was announced that the winner of the controversial construction project would be chosen by draw so no-one could say there was any favoritism. Short after, a video of the draw appeared on the Internet. On the tape, there is tragic-comic scene where a man looks through the box of papers for a few minutes and then picks out the name of the winner. Out of dozens of less known firms, he picked the well-known group of three companies that had been cooperating with the council for a long time on various construction projects.