This peer-reviewed country report includes:
Integrity Indicators Scorecard: Scores, scoring criteria, commentary, references, and peer review perspectives for more than 300 Integrity Indicators.
Reporter's Notebook: An on-the-ground look at corruption and integrity from a leading local journalist.
Corruption Timeline: Ten years of political context to today's corruption and integrity issues.
Peru has made significant gains since Global Integrity’s previous assessment of the country in 2007. The country’s overall improvement has been bolstered in part by more effective implementation of its already very strong legislative anti-corruption framework. Citizen access to information has seen improvements, and a recently passed whistle-blowing protection law for the public sector is now in place. The audit agency is relatively well-staffed, independent, and effective, and citizens are able to access audit reports easily. Nevertheless, the power of the anti-corruption agency to carry out independent investigations continues to be compromised because it is under the control of the executive branch. Moreover, its ability to initiate investigations independently is “highly determined by the political style of the prime minister.” Rules to regulate conflicts of interest amongst members of the judiciary and civil service are weak; while the asset disclosures of judges are occasionally audited when scandals erupt, there is little systematic auditing. Law enforcement suffers from ongoing politicization, and its efforts to reform and professionalize are hampered by limited resources.